不结婚
EconoScope | Hoshine case puts U.S. forced-labor enforcement to the test_我的网站
一 | (ECNS) -- U.S. restrictions on Chinese companies over alleged “forced labor” are facing growing scrutiny, both over the facts behind such accusations and the legal procedures used to enforce them. Recently, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), under the Department of Homeland Security, updated its records to remove Hoshine Silicon (Jia Xing) Co., Ltd., a Chinese photovoltaic supply-chain company, from the scope of a Withhold Release Order (WRO) related to alleged forced labor in Xinjiang. Li Guogang, senior legal counsel at Tahota Law Firm who represented Hoshine Silicon, told China News Network that this is the first known case of a Chinese company being removed from the scope of such a U.S. enforcement measure related to Xinjiang. He described it as a milestone for Chinese companies seeking to challenge U.S. actions involving alleged forced labor. From being targeted to having to prove its innocence In recent years, the U.S. has repeatedly used WROs and Xinjiang-related legislation to impose trade restrictions on Chinese companies. For businesses caught up in such enforcement measures, proving that their products and supply chains are not connected to alleged forced labor can become a major hurdle. The Hoshine case highlights the difficult burden placed on companies facing such measures. Rather than authorities being required to disclose the full basis for their allegations through a transparent process, affected companies may find themselves having to submit extensive evidence to demonstrate that the accusations against them are unfounded. “We submitted 4,000 to 5,000 pages of materials, including audit results and detailed explanations of the supply chain, to demonstrate that the allegations of forced labor against Hoshine Silicon were without factual basis,” Li said. The company’s experience also shows how difficult it can be for businesses to challenge such enforcement actions. According to Li, U.S. customs authorities initially rejected Hoshine Silicon’s applications for removal twice. The situation changed after the company took the case to the U.S. Court of International Trade. The dispute subsequently moved through judicial proceedings, and the enforcement measure was eventually lifted as it applied to Hoshine Silicon. The shift from administrative enforcement to judicial review is significant. It shows that when allegations lack sufficient factual support, legal procedures can still provide companies with an important avenue to seek relief and challenge government decisions. The significance goes beyond one company The significance of the Hoshine case lies in more than one company being removed from the scope of a U.S. trade restriction. In recent years, U.S. restrictions on Chinese companies have expanded far beyond traditional tariffs, extending into supply chains, investment, technology and national security. Issues involving Xinjiang and alleged military ties have also increasingly become part of Washington’s economic policy toolkit toward China. One direct result is greater uncertainty for Chinese companies seeking to enter or operate in the U.S. market. Businesses must consider not only product prices, quality and competitiveness, but also the additional risks created by shifts in U.S. domestic politics and regulatory policy. China’s Ministry of Commerce has repeatedly stated that Xinjiang enjoys social stability, economic development and improving living standards, and that there is no forced labor of any kind in the region. A recent case involving Chinese pharmaceutical and life-sciences company WuXi AppTec offers another example worth watching. The company has also challenged its designation by the U.S. Department of Defense as a “Chinese military company.” A U.S. court recently granted WuXi AppTec a preliminary injunction, temporarily blocking the designation while the case proceeds. The court found that the company was likely to succeed in arguing that the Defense Department’s decision was arbitrary and capricious, pointing to problems in how some of the evidence had been interpreted. From Xinjiang-related restrictions to military-related designations, the U.S. government has increasingly brought political and national-security considerations into its treatment of Chinese companies. When political tools are repeatedly used to blacklist Chinese businesses, the consequences go beyond the outcome of a single lawsuit. They can also affect global companies’ confidence in the predictability of the U.S. market and its legal and regulatory environment. If companies must spend enormous amounts of time and money simply to demonstrate that allegations against them lack sufficient evidence, questions inevitably arise over whether confidence in U.S. market rules and legal institutions can be sustained. Commercial rules ultimately depend on institutions that are stable, transparent and predictable. When administrative power increasingly intervenes in normal international trade, and when market risks depend more heavily on political judgments, the impact extends beyond one company or one supply chain. It can shape global businesses’ long-term expectations of the stability and reliability of the U.S. market. The cases of Hoshine Silicon and WuXi AppTec have therefore opened more than a gap in individual blacklists. They have exposed a potential crack in the broader machinery of U.S. sanctions and restrictions. When allegations fail to withstand legal scrutiny and enforcement actions lack sufficient factual support, the credibility of those measures inevitably comes into question. For Chinese companies, the message from these cases is clear: being placed under a U.S. restriction does not necessarily mark the end of the story. Evidence, legal procedures and judicial review can still challenge administrative decisions — and, in doing so, expose weaknesses in U.S. enforcement actions driven more by political considerations than by solid evidence. (By Gong Weiwei) 
。 香港8月24日电（谢妞）由香港大公文汇传媒集团主办的全球独角兽大会24日在香港会展中心开幕。大会以“天生骐骥·创领未来”为核心主题，推动全球独角兽企业落户香港、来港上市、借港出海，助力香港国际创科中心建设。 据介绍，全球独角兽大会是面向全球独角兽企业、隐形独角兽企业、高成长科技企业、科研院所等的高端创科交流与投融资合作平台。本届大会聚焦人工智能、生物医药、金融科技等领域，打造“论坛、展览、路演、对接、竞赛”五位一体的多元互动场景，促进科技成果落地转化，推动战略新兴产业与未来产业跨区域协同发展。 开幕仪式上，香港特区行政长官李家超致辞表示，面对科技浪潮的加速迭代，香港更要培育壮大新兴产业和未来产业，完善产业创新、发展生态，为发展新质生产力带来庞大机遇。
二 | 对于内地的初创和独角兽企业，香港是进军国际市场的最强跳板、布局全球供应链的战略支点；对于海外顶尖科创企业，香港是探索内地市场的首选枢纽、拓展中国机遇的黄金门户。 香港大公文汇传媒集团董事长李大宏表示，首届全球独角兽大会让各界共同见证一场汇聚全球创新力量，连接科技与资本、研发与产业的盛会。期待大会能成为各方合作的起点，更多企业成果从香港走向世界。 中国生物制药有限公司首席执行长谢承润表示，作为连接国家创新体系与全球市场的枢纽，香港具备深厚的研发优势、成熟的经营体系、开放的应用场景及完善的支付环境。
三 | 面对粤港澳大湾区建设的战略机遇，香港必将进一步发挥全球独角兽生态“连接器”与“孵化器”的作用，释放巨大创新势能。 活动现场，深圳逐际动力科技有限公司展示其多款前沿产品，吸引众多参观者驻足交流。
四 | 逐际动力董事会秘书及投资者关系负责人陈丰说，香港是国际金融和贸易枢纽，希望借助本次大会吸引更多海外客户，推动公司全球化业务迈上新台阶。 本届大会汇聚了200余家全球独角兽企业、100余家高成长科技企业、100余家投资机构及专业服务机构、50余家科研院校和政府部门。
Current article:http://ygy92b.yinkataizengquge.bond/news/20260826_8388463.html
Published on:00:39:54